Was it Renault who had the clear out? the same woman at Mansfield said it was Renault wanting more money from them to stay a Renault dealer and they refused to pay.
If that is indeed the case then one might surmise Renault utilised an extremely effective trick in order to get rid of people they did not want destroying their reputation: a drastic increase in the franchise fees while weighing up the probability that it is unlikely the lamentable will pay: the result is that dealers struggling to satisfy their customers have a lack of capital and as a result they... throw their toys out of the pram and walk away. Thus, Renault and other businesses built on the franchise model don’t have to worry about the (expensive and time consuming) legalities of decommissioning a dealership. At the same time it is of course good practise to keep to a minimum the price increase (of the license) for those dealers that behave in a professional manner. The problem for Renault
et al arises when a business owns several dealerships, but begins a precipitous fall in it’s after-care, unfortunately they now have the means and resources (monetary and human (i.e. a legal team)) to defend against the tactic outlined above. This results in your pain, when dealing with that particular bunion, being prolonged.
We also have the problem of those franchises who know they are on their way out: thusly, if you are a punter of one of these, you are doing nothing but butting your head against a wall
and as such you must make the decision to move to another dealer or workshop or when it comes to your bill or indeed service in general, you will find sitting down rather uncomfortable.:001_huh:...
mg:...:scared: (no offence intended :hug
because they are on a mission to get every last penny they can out of you
What we need (and I would argue deserve) as consumers is a paradigm shift in the business practises of UK firms, from the ego-centric: get what you can from ‘em, fill our boots and f*ck em; to a consumer-centric: our customers will pay our bills/ salaries/ bonuses etc. if we treat Mr. A and Mrs B with some dignity. The latter does, as I am sure you all know, work highly effectively; but it still remains a mystery to me, why so many going into business choose the former :f1team07:
when Renault culled the model range they culled dealers as well....
As far as a cull, a slimming of the product range and a clearing of the worst vendors works well and any losses in this metamorphoses are calculated, for instance there was a little company once on the verge of utter collapse; people used to jeer at it (I was a proud owner of one of their laptops in the early 90s and still use their computers today) and of course people still try to sneer at it, (and in this instance lets just put that sneering down to one or more of the seven deadly sins (a useful reference for the sake of the argument :headphone
; but they took some extremely brave decisions: two of which were a slimming of their product line and a clearing out of the worst vendors; and on the back of those decisions things are now a little different. It is the case that people now look to that little company and say “you know that is not a bad way to do business” and they of course, are quite right :liambo: