ok so I today I've been at Paul's workshop, it was a long trek for me driving there from London, M25 is a nightmare on weekdays but luckily no accidents therefore a clear(ish) run for me
Well it was interesting I have to say, really interesting but again I wasn't surprised at all, kind of expecting it really....
The first thing Paul asked me was which cams I'm running and if I had a map on the car already, when I said the magic word (K-tec) he did smile and the only thing he said was...'this will be interesting''. As if it wouldn't be
Anyway, I don't want to start any battles here or to initiate any tuning wars, this is a personal feedback from a personal experience and let's leave it to that.
Since I left Ktec last summer (after installing the induction kit and having the maps tweaked by them) the car suffered from unstable idle. The idle was low and sometimes it would drop to 500rpm pretending to stall (never did) and then back up again. I contacted ktec by email reporting the issue while mentioning the ''mapping'' word but I was reassured that there is definitely nothing wrong there and that it must be a lambda sensor or something. Since then I checked everything, air leaks, vacuums leaks, throttle body, lambda sensors (I actually swapped one over with Ben's when swapping the exhaust) etc but I couldn't rectify the problem. Something deep down (not that deep tbh) was telling me that it was the mapping.
Apart from that and since fitting the cams the car below 3k rpm was worse than before, it would hesitate a bit and then it'd go. That was more obvious when exiting a corner on uphill but because it was like that from day 1 I though it was normal, more aggressive cams after all so it had to have less power low down right? And K-tec couldn't have done something wrong because it's a prestigious company with package presentations on Evo magazine, thousands of followers on fb and massive clientele. No I wasn't a marketing victim, not at all...
Anyhow, my car pulled 205bhp on K-tec's rollers without the Akrapovic, it pulled 193bhp with the Akrapovic Evo on RST's rollers. The engine would knock (Paul said it was a very good thing I always run it on Super Unleaded because it'd knock as it is, things would have been worse on normal petrol), the fueling was wrong, same with the vvt timing.
He had the car about an hour on the dyno tweaking his way through, lots of runs and at the end we ended up with the magic and round 200bhp figure. I know that people say numbers are numbers etc but I was a bit disappointed, not with RST
obviously but with the engine. I was expecting more from a cammed car with an Akra without a catalyst. Even Paul said that it's a bit underpowered and he expressed his reservations regarding the physical timing of the cams but he put my worries at rest telling me that the car now works allright and that he wouldn't let it go if he thought otherwise. I believed him...
He also asked me if I've been told that the mapping was custom, which was correct. He said that he's seen the very exact mapping on numerous occasions...
Then we went for a run just to make sure everything was fine...and it was. The car operates smoothly, as smoothly as it gets, the idle is
spot on and no hesitation at all. It pulls harder as well, I can really tell a difference and it's not a placebo at all. The car's drivability is night and day...
Here are the graphs, power at the wheels/AFR, power/torque
Untitled by
YiannisR27, on Flickr
Untitled by
YiannisR27, on Flickr
As you can clearly see, the car would run rich, lean and then rich again. It was not as bad as other graphs I've seen (like as rich as 9 and as lean as 20) but bad nevertheless. I can tell from how the car drives anyway.
The epilogue is that I'm really happy with the outcome and of course I can now put my mind at peace...
Will I go back to K-tec again? I believe you can answer that yourselves...