I'm not saying you're not honest, but that dyno isn't. :biggrin:
Just look at the torque curve - it's so smooth...TBH, too smooth...
Only ever seen one real smooth curve and thats mine (after the ECU) before that when mapped it was up and down like yours!!
Hmmmm are you all serious that jus cos im punching out abit more power that a big, well known national company like AmD have shitty dynos???
In which case i'm going to be getting it dyno'd elsewhere probaly next week so all rumours can be put to rest.
Thanks.
Hmmmm are you all serious that jus cos im punching out abit more power that a big, well known national company like AmD have shitty dynos???
In which case i'm going to be getting it dyno'd elsewhere probaly next week so all rumours can be put to rest.
Thanks.
Hmmmm are you all serious that jus cos im punching out abit more power that a big, well known national company like AmD have shitty dynos???
In which case i'm going to be getting it dyno'd elsewhere probaly next week so all rumours can be put to rest.
Thanks.
Do you think that just the cams can get you 30hp more?
Hmmmm are you all serious that jus cos im punching out abit more power that a big, well known national company like AmD have shitty dynos???
Yes, that was the first thing I've noticed and the first sign that something is not right with the dyno or the dyno operator.
Looking good though, but - can you overlap this curve with your previous one? Would be very interesting to see. :thumbup1:
I've just spent an hour laughing myself silly at a VEMs standalone map done there. Just as an example...target idle 1100rpm (wild cams, that's fine) lambda sensor switched on below 1000rpm, ermmmmm WTF?. Oh, here's another one, lowest load point 8% throttle opening (should have 3 lines of map below that) Idle motor function turned on.....with throttle bodies, erm there isn't one. and spark idle correction not active.
He doesn't have a clue
so who do you recommend for mapping then? that anyone on here?
My mate Matt at TDF (who bulit and wrote my ECU) in Cambs mate, wont get better TBH!!
No they dont! They are far too similar (nearly identical) to stock as I have found out!
It could be a good un tho, thats why I want a back to back with mine!
Not shitty dynos but probably not calibrated right or the electronics interfer too much with the readings of the dyno.
As for the results I wouldn't worry about them. The dyno is simply a tool to tune the car properly and not to tell you how much bhp the car's got. To many factors depend on that number. See the dyno more like a "gadget" to tell you how much hp/Nm you gained with your mods. That's why it's best to do a run before you mod you car and after.
For a more precise info how much bhp your car's got you could use something like the Racelogic Performacebox. You'd have atmospheric pressure driving along and can measure everything from 0-100km/h, 100-200km/h (cause it's GPS based), horsepower, torque, etc.
so who do you recommend for mapping then? that anyone on here?
no guru, I'm not a mapper, but i've done a bit. Know enough from working with very experienced mappers though.not a fan then !
so your a bit of a guru then on mapping ?
sideways danny who do you work for? Seen you posting on cliosport but cant remember.
How about when i get mine remapped where ever i decide Ben and Kev book in aswell and get power runs? then that will settle it lol