Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has one and some of them smell. Nobody will ever agree when it comes to rival cars, look at Ford & Holden in Australia.
Clio > Corsa, I think, because of how much time has gone into the R&D and engineering of the Clio down the years compared to the Corsa and it shows. The engine, the chassis, the brakes, it's all just ''right'' from the off. As opposed to being ''alright''.
Renault have been making hot cars for years and as such are pretty much the daddy when it comes to this kind of car...
5, 19, 21, 16V, Williams, V6, 172, 225, 182, 230, 197, R26, R27, R26R, 133, 200, 250...
Vs.
Nova GTE/SRi, Astra GTE/SRi/GSi, Astra VXR, Corsa VXR...
D'uh, winning...
I'm not saying the Corsa is a BAD car. But it's not as good as the Clio. They do look the part but I think because of how aggressive they're been styled, they do attract a certain sort of person and have acquired themselves a bit of an image problem. Whereas the Clios have always been pretty subtle styling-wise but have still been beefed up over standard which I think some people would view as being a bit more classy and a bit less Halfords/Max Power. Corsas don't handle as well as the Clios. I don't care what anybody says, they do not drive and stick like a Clio when comparing STANDARD cars. Fair enough they're quick in a straight line and with minimal £s they can be turned into little monsters. But the brakes and the chassis just aren't as well polished as the Clios.
The interiors are smart though and Recaros as standard can't be sniffed at.
Clio if you like subtlety, trackdays, fine roads and ''waaarrrrr'' NA madness.
Corsa if you like ''kruizin'' and 1/4 Miles and ''p'tisssshhh''.
Horses for courses.
* And yes, I have driven both and I only own one of them.