I've just managed to get one off a Megane F1, dam if this came earlier...
I'm busy working out a new backing plate as there is no way am putting that mild steel thing in.
Or I could do a swop? If somebody wants an original version like the pedals and I'll take an RS with a custom number like above? Anybody?
Ok.....So. Lets get rid of one decision to be made at a time......First:
As far as i see it: there are various ways of affixing these foot-plates that i've read about: 1/ Velcro 2/ Carpet Tape 3/ Rivets 4/ Bolting etc etc. And all of these will in my opinion require an area of the plate to be "perforation free / solid material" so if using tape or velcro - it has a decent sized completely flat area to 1/ Stick tape etc on the plate and 2/ So any tape or velcro wont be visible through; or doesn't require cutting around the holes.
So - below is are two quick drawing's of designs to encompass two rectangular areas either side of the "RS" logo.
NOTE: As previously discussed - the "RS" logo will be cut right through the plate (Meaning you'll see your carpet colour looking through it), and as above - the rectangles i've drawn either side of the logo wont actually exist or show as-such, but i've drawn in just to signify where a solid / blank area of the foot-plate will be in order to make fitting a tidier / easier / better looking task.
So. All i need is a simple "1" "1b" or "2" to denote your choice of design.
I'll leave it up for a day or two and then we'll simply go with the majority
@sevenfourate, I think that would be better, yes. Reason I went for style 1 is that the fixing points will be nearer to the ends of the footrest & therefore I think they'll be more secure.
@sevenfourate, I think that would be better, yes. Reason I went for style 1 is that the fixing points will be nearer to the ends of the footrest & therefore I think they'll be more secure.
1b added @Johnny 99 - and i've taken the liberty of updating your vote !
We could even move the "blank" parts further out slightly - and only have one line of holes outside of the plain part - not the two as pictured. But your thoughts and reasons are rightfully noted !
1b added @Johnny 99 - and i've taken the liberty of updating your vote !
We could even move then "blank" parts further out slightly - and only have one line of holes outside of the plain part - not the two as pictured. But your thoughts are rightfully noted !