Looks great! Although does anybody know if the pipe from the intercooler to the throttle body would fit behind 197 Xenon units as there isn't much space there.
Looks great! Although does anybody know if the pipe from the intercooler to the throttle body would fit behind 197 Xenon units as there isn't much space there.
Looks great! Although does anybody know if the pipe from the intercooler to the throttle body would fit behind 197 Xenon units as there isn't much space there.
That's a very valid point!Anything will fit with determination/slight modification lol i changed my lights on my 200 from reflectors to projectors and were both exactly the same size/fitment.
Port shapes are different mate, so no can do.that looks really good the pipe work could be simplified alot buy using a 250 inlet manifold tho
I'm sure the conversion is top notch but £5000 is too much imo. There was/is a turbo conversion for the standard engine, bumping power up to 250/225 available for £4000, and that price also included a camshaft swap. But then tuning an N/A engine by means of cams/exhaust or turbo/supercharger is never a cheap game.Theres a vid of this on the rollers now at RST but nothing worth watching as it wasnt a power run.
question is who else wants one at 5k?
im almost certain theyre the same but i could be wrong
Great to see RST which is such a reputable company is going to be releasing such a package for our cars.
However people need to remember that it's not the peak power our cars lack of but the low/mid range torque. If the SC does not rectify this then it won't be £5k well spent (even though the price is reasonable).
I'd have to disagree there slightly. Sticking with the n/a feel but having 300 instead of 200bhp when it comes on cam is surely a massive benefit?Exactly, its how about how they drive. Ive had turbo cars and I prefer the NA feel. No point spending £5k on something that has power still when it comes on cam.
Having looked at power graphs for a decently mapped 200 with just the basics Vs the s/c Vs a meg conv it's pretty clear as a road car the meg is going to pull the s/c pants down. On a track there's going to be not alot in it.
The problem with the s/c is you have a high compression engine with increased parasitic loss from the charger. From the graph I looked at that is private there's nothing to be had untill 3700 over the stock in fact it's almost identical but obviously different dynos blah blah blah.
The charger keeps the character of the Clio engine where as the meg clearly changes it alot so it's purely personal preference.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
I FINALLY BOUGHT MY FIRST CAR ! | New Members | 4 | ||
J | Odd Noise and Vibration Upon Starting in First Gear | Clio 197 Area | 0 | |
Hey guys, Renault n00bie here! First time owner! | New Members | 6 | ||
First Renault cup 197 | New Members | 9 | ||
L | Set of 6 laguna silverstone wheels | Car Parts For Sale | 5 |