P0004 'Fuel Volume Regulator Control circuit High' can use some help

Hello all,

Yesterday I brought my car, a 321k (200k miles) well-maintained 2007 Clio RS 197 to the Dutch equivalent of the MOT ('APK') and it was NOK on too high CO emissions: 1.53% (permitted: 0.3%, so 5x out of spec). Since the car is stock I was a bit surprised. Per chemistry class and google it suggests a bunch of things but in short: too much fuel or too little air. Now I'd like to avoid just firing up the parts-cannon and actually be able to diagnose the problem.

I did a few things so far:
1) read out diagnostics code. Note that the car has no CEL, but a code-scan did throw a P0004 - 'Fuel Volume Regulator Control circuit High'. Without knowing the fuel-system of my RS I am not a 100% sure what the set-criteria for this code are? Any help/service data on this would be helpful and appreciated since I can correlate this error to the emissions NOK.
2) insert a fuel system cleaner, drive 50k (35 miles), reset codes. I was able to clear the code but as soon as I switch on the car it instantly pops the code back up.
3) inspect exhaust system: I opened up and the cat looks like new and I don't see any exhaust leaks. I did read elsewhere that people were referring to an 'manifold-cat'. While the header/manifold looks stock (if it is aftermarket I am very impressed with the weld-quality) and looks equally weathered as the stock exhaust it does not contain a catalytic converter. Is this market-specific? Also I would have expected this to pop up as an issue in earlier APKs (It's my third annual check for the car and the first time the emission is an issue). 20250802_122156.jpg

So my primary suspect is currently in the fuel supply system for which I've read I'll be dropping the fuel-tank. Not a problem but I'd like to understand what sets the P0004 code since it suggests that it somehow measures or derives that the the required volume is high? Could it be anything else than a faulty FPR (which in itself doesn't send a signal I think). It could of course also be that the 2 problems are completely uncorrelated and I'd like to avoid spending a bunch of effort into dropping the tank to only to learn at the APK that I'm back at square 1.

I've read in another thread a question: does my car have an external fuel filter since it's EU? It doesn't, at least per this image:

--> I only have the canister (I at least assume that's what it is), not the filter.


Final question of which I'm affraid I already know the answer: since my exhaust is not split (only at the cat) does that mean that the rear-axle has to come out in order to drop the exhaust in order to drop the tank?

Picture of the car at hand 20250703_101745.jpg
 
The fuel pump can be changed blindly by disconnecting the fuel filler hose from the tank and lowering it at that side I have done it. I don't think it is your problem a guy on the forum was having the same MOT failure he changed the fist Lambda and the fueling was corrected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean197
Thanks for your reply. I'll see if I can get the app to do a readout on the lambda-sensors, see if the values make sorta-kinda sense.
 
Sure if the co emissions are too high that means the catalytic converter is knackered? What's the other two values lambda and hydrocarbons? They should have taken those readings too on the emissions,that will help diagnose if it's the cat or not.
 
Yes, that would have been super-helpful except they didn't share in-spec measurement results (they only mention the out of spec values) and I completely forgot (it's been a decade since I had an issue with emissions on any of my cars..). It's quite difficult to make a sharp picture of the cat but the mesh inside the cat is looking basically like new - see attachment - this is looking downstream.
 

Attachments

  • 20250801_174703.jpg
    20250801_174703.jpg
    758 KB · Views: 3
NOK???

is it nox to high? co to high?

are the 1st lambda sensor voltages fluctuating alot ie its working right

did they get the cat hot enough so it actually works?
 
Ah sorry for the confusion, on work we use 'NOK' on a daily base to indicate 'Not OK', I sometimes forget the rest of the world doesn't use it that way. So to clarify: CO (carbon monoxide) emissions are too high.

1 of my concerns is (was) indeed that the cat was maybe not hot enough since I did have to wait for an hour before it was my turn (although the place is 8 miles down the road so you'd think that be suffice), but most places will try for some time to get the values down by just letting the car warm up thoroughly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxspeed