Chlorinated Paraffin Additives

A number of ‘add-on’ additives intended to improve the performance of commercially available automotive lubricants have been marketed in recent years, under such names as ‘Xxtralube ZX-1’, ‘Metol FX-1’, ‘PPL Anti-Friction’ and ‘Activ-8’.All such products share the following characteristics with ‘X-1R Friction Eliminator’:-

1)They all contain chlorinated paraffin ‘extreme pressure’(EP) compounds first used in the 1930s in heavily-loaded industrial gearboxes, and in some automotive transmission applications, mainly hypoid gears.

2)They all corrode copper-based alloys at moderate temperatures, easily exceeded in all engine, and most transmission applications. This problem was recognised in the 1930s, and chlorinated compounds were never used in transmissions with bronze bearings or gears. No responsible manufacturer ever suggested using them in engines where their increasing activity at high temperatures could lead to piston ring corrosion and bore glazing. (For the same reason, modern ‘hypoid’ additives are not used in engines, even though they are much safer than any chlorinated additive.)

3)X-1R Friction Eliminator and its clones are based upon very outdated technology, which was abandoned by responsible lubricant manufacturers for automotive transmission uses in the 1950s. Chlorinated compounds still find applications in metal working, but their use is on the decline because of health and safety considerations.

4)When burnt, chlorinated paraffins produce corrosive hydrochloric acid, and organo-chlorine compounds including the highly poisonous phosgene gas. Apart from these corrosion and health hazards, with petrol engines the deactivation of exhaust catalysts is also a problem.

5)Unfortunately, these additives give spectacular results in simple EP test machines such as the ‘Falex’. As a marketing ploy, a demonstration of this type looks impressive to those not aquainted with the above facts. Also attractive is the low cost of chlorinated compounds, allowing profits of several thousand percent to be made.
 
very interesting :thumbup1:

on the subject of "additives" do you have any inside info on what ferrari were using on their F1 engines - i seem to remember a snippet of info refering to research done by nasa on additives and ferrari using this in their f1 engies for a short while - pretty sure an engine failure was put down to "a secret engine coating/additive" ???
 
I'm not sure if this is the same thing as as what you are talking about, but we may sell that one. Muc Off produce a PTFE spray to protect motorbikes. Ferrari started using it to coat their engines between races as it's very good. If it is the thing that caused the failure, I would say it's not really Muc Offs fault as the spray is for coating the outside of bikes, not the internals of the engine and if they did use it internally, they should have made sure it had all been removed before they started the engine
 
I'm not sure if this is the same thing as as what you are talking about, but we may sell that one. Muc Off produce a PTFE spray to protect motorbikes. Ferrari started using it to coat their engines between races as it's very good. If it is the thing that caused the failure, I would say it's not really Muc Offs fault as the spray is for coating the outside of bikes, not the internals of the engine and if they did use it internally, they should have made sure it had all been removed before they started the engine

no dont think it was that - i think it was something off nasa's "secrets" list that was then open to the general public !