OK, probably was you then. Your half six in the morning comment threw me.
I was in the missus' car, so you wouldn't have noticed me going the other way!
Do mostly short journeys, so the consumption ain't great. Lots of nice driving roads round my way, so the car spends a lot of time bouncing off the limiter, too! 8)
Doesn't have to have been a turbo. Pumabuild's 2.3 conversion can be taken to over 200bhp quite easily and will apparently go to around 300 with a full rebuild on an aftermarket ECU.
http://pumabuild.co.uk/feature_6.htm
http://pumabuild.co.uk/cons_fiesta.htm
As I only get 200-250 miles to a tank, nigh on 4900 miles would be around 20 fills for me at 50 quid a pop. That's a grand and the reason I don't do 4884 miles a month!
I've got a Karcher and it works just fine. It's a K6.85 I think.
On the subject of pressure, I recall reading that you can't achieve 150-160 bar as claimed by some manufacturers with a single phase motor. You have to go 3 phase or petrol/diesel to get that sort of pressure.
Maybe so, but this inward action can't be starving the engine of air or it would lose significant power at the top end, wouldn't it? I bet the cross sectional area of the hose is hardly affected at all otherwise the manufacturer would've done something about It during development.
I bet it isn't. Go in any electrical retailer and they'll tell you they get more Samsung gear returned than any other make. Their DVD recorders are supposed to be particularly bad.
You shouldn't be plugging in the mains lead with the power on! You've probably spiked some component inside doing that and fubar'd the TV now. Game over, I'd say.